Like "real" programming languages, Bash has functions, though in a somewhat limited implementation. A function is a subroutine, a code block that implements a set of operations, a "black box" that performs a specified task. Wherever there is repetitive code, when a task repeats with only slight variations in procedure, then consider using a function.
function function_name {
command...
}
function_name () {
command...
}
This second form will cheer the hearts of C programmers (and is more portable).
As in C, the function's opening bracket may optionally appear on the second line.
function_name ()
{
command...
}
A function may be "compacted" into a single line.
In this case, however, a semicolon must follow the final command in the function.
|
Functions are called, triggered, simply by invoking their names. A function call is equivalent to a command.
Example 24-1. Simple functions
#!/bin/bash # ex59.sh: Exercising functions (simple). JUST_A_SECOND=1 funky () { # This is about as simple as functions get. echo "This is a funky function." echo "Now exiting funky function." } # Function declaration must precede call. fun () { # A somewhat more complex function. i=0 REPEATS=30 echo echo "And now the fun really begins." echo sleep $JUST_A_SECOND # Hey, wait a second! while [ $i -lt $REPEATS ] do echo "----------FUNCTIONS---------->" echo "<------------ARE-------------" echo "<------------FUN------------>" echo let "i+=1" done } # Now, call the functions. funky fun exit $? |
The function definition must precede the first call to it. There is no method of "declaring" the function, as, for example, in C.
f1 # Will give an error message, since function "f1" not yet defined. declare -f f1 # This doesn't help either. f1 # Still an error message. # However... f1 () { echo "Calling function \"f2\" from within function \"f1\"." f2 } f2 () { echo "Function \"f2\"." } f1 # Function "f2" is not actually called until this point, #+ although it is referenced before its definition. # This is permissible. # Thanks, S.C. |
|
It is even possible to nest a function within another function, although this is not very useful.
f1 () { f2 () # nested { echo "Function \"f2\", inside \"f1\"." } } f2 # Gives an error message. # Even a preceding "declare -f f2" wouldn't help. echo f1 # Does nothing, since calling "f1" does not automatically call "f2". f2 # Now, it's all right to call "f2", #+ since its definition has been made visible by calling "f1". # Thanks, S.C. |
Function declarations can appear in unlikely places, even where a command would otherwise go.
ls -l | foo() { echo "foo"; } # Permissible, but useless. if [ "$USER" = bozo ] then bozo_greet () # Function definition embedded in an if/then construct. { echo "Hello, Bozo." } fi bozo_greet # Works only for Bozo, and other users get an error. # Something like this might be useful in some contexts. NO_EXIT=1 # Will enable function definition below. [[ $NO_EXIT -eq 1 ]] && exit() { true; } # Function definition in an "and-list". # If $NO_EXIT is 1, declares "exit ()". # This disables the "exit" builtin by aliasing it to "true". exit # Invokes "exit ()" function, not "exit" builtin. # Or, similarly: filename=file1 [ -f "$filename" ] && foo () { rm -f "$filename"; echo "File "$filename" deleted."; } || foo () { echo "File "$filename" not found."; touch bar; } foo # Thanks, S.C. and Christopher Head |
Function names can take strange forms.
_(){ for i in {1..10}; do echo -n "$FUNCNAME"; done; echo; } # ^^^ No space between function name and parentheses. # This doesn't always work. Why not? # Now, let's invoke the function. _ # __________ # ^^^^^^^^^^ 10 underscores (10 x function name)! # A "naked" underscore is an acceptable function name. # In fact, a colon is likewise an acceptable function name. :(){ echo ":"; }; : # Of what use is this? # It's a devious way to obfuscate the code in a script. |
What happens when different versions of the same function appear in a script?
|